India’s Water Conflicts: Politics over Water

Being here for three months working on watershed issues has indirectly led me to other unstable issues here in India. Water conflicts in India are becoming explo­sive and politicians are working hard to sustain them over a long period of time. Practically every state in India, particularly in the south, has at least one or more conflicts over water distribution with its neighbor. Maharashtra, Karnataka and Andhra Pradesh are at loggerheads with each other over the sharing of the Krishna waters; Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, Pondicherry and Kerala are in conflict over the Cauvery; Kerala and Tamil Nadu are fighting over the 113-year old Mullaperiyar dam. The intensity and frequency of these conflicts are increasing. No doubt that it will become worse with the in­creasing uncertainty of climate change.

Despite having negotiated several settlements with Pakistan over water with the help of mediators, it seems as though it is very difficult for Indian states to han­dle internal conflicts over water. One of the reasons is that there is a lack of an efficient frame­work and mediating mechanism for con­flict resolution, both within the govern­ment and civil society. There are a number of common themes among the conflicts over water in India.  For example, it is common for downstream users to distrust upstream dam building and operation, and this kind of conflict exists within states and between regions, at levels ranging from the village to the basin level. The other important aspect is that India’s systems are not oriented towards building trust. In fact, very often, the contrary is the case, especially when such conflicts overlap with state boundaries.

Another issue I see is that there is a lack of a scientific approach to water management. The science and the policy of dealing with water sharing have both considerably advanced in recent times around the world and especially in the United States. Water manage­ment in India does not seem to have advanced as much. As a result of a lack of communication between scientists and policymakers (ala Copenhagen) river flows have fallen below levels and have disappeared in many important fishing communities. India seems to have its own brand of the “rule of capture”. Dam construction technology has led to a construction race that aims at capturing every drop of water that everyone is entitled to. The complexity of climate change adds another serious dimension to the conflict. While the precise change in rainfall is disputed, all climate models agree on the likelihood of the increase of extreme events – extreme surpluses and extreme shortages.

This entry was posted in 2010 and tagged , , , , , on by .

About sachinshah

Sachin Shah completed his undergraduate at the University of Texas at Austin Jackson School of Geosciences with a degree in Hydrogeology in 1999. Sachin spent nine years at the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) in Atlanta, Georgia and Austin, Texas. He worked primarily on water resources issues including international transboundary water concerns, drought mitigation, and using new technologies to understanding groundwater resource availability and quality. Sachin has travelled to various parts of the U.S. and the world conducting hydrologic research in such places as Honduras after tropical storm Mitch and the United Arab Emirates. In 2009, Sachin made the decision to resign from his post at USGS to refocus his energy towards non-profit management, and environmental and climate change policy. Sachin is a first year Masters Global Policy Studies graduate student at the University of Texas LBJ School of Public Affairs and hopes to have a nonprofit focusing on equitable allocation of water resources in rural areas.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>